• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Broadband

The Worst Trade Show in the World

by Dana Blankenhorn
June 6, 2006
in Broadband, Broadband Gap, Communications Policy, Competitive Broadband Fiber, innovation, Internet, investment, network neutrality
2
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Kevin_martinBack in the day I used to attend Supercomm every year. I got my last job at Supercomm. Turned out to be a rip-off, the biggest financial mistake of my life.

Now the show is called Globalcomm, and it is (if anything) worse. Globalcomm is where Bell companies worldwide go to buy equipment and tell lies.

Some of the lies they tell:

  • Networking is hard.
  • Networks have to be very expensive.
  • Networks can only be run by big companies.
  • Costs are rising.
  • Competition is just another word.

For the last five years, Michael Powell and (now) Kevin Martin have hauled themselves to this show and gone along with the double-speak, while the U.S. Internet has become less-and-less competitive.

It was good to see Carlo at Techdirt call Powell on this nonsense today. Complete with links.

My own view follows.

It’s all Internet now. There is no phone network. There is no cable network. There are just bits.

The phone and cable duopoly seek to carve out 99% of those bits for themselves, and sell you only 1% as a "last-mile" that is incapable of providing the services which bits can provide all over the world, that is, services which compete with the other stuff they’re selling.

Oh, and they don’t want any competition. Not from CLECs. Not from municipalities. Not from ISPs. Not from broadband suppliers. Not from Google.

They call this competition, and they use the power of the government to enforce this Orwellian reality.

Kevin Martin complies with their requests because (for now) they have the money. And thus the U.S. Internet becomes more-and-more like that of Mexico every year. (Boy is Canada going to be surprised.)

Martin, like Powell, is a tool of monopolists. Our bills are rising-and-rising, and the capabilities of our links are falling-and-falling, while choices are disappearing, and the actual costs of providing the transport are falling like a stone.

An 802.11 radio can move 100 mbps for $200. The cost of moving a gigabit over optical fiber goes down every year, not just thanks to DWDM but in making fiber ,  in what fiber is made of, in what fiber can do, but in delivering more bits per fiber.

So backhaul is cheaper, the last mile is cheaper, switching can be optical, and everything can be Internet.

Yet we’re paying more for less, and Kevin Martin is praising all this as "competition?"

Moron.

Tags: GlobalcommInternet technologyInternet topologynetwork neutralitytelecommunications
Previous Post

The Value of Telecommuting

Next Post

God Bites Man at Yale

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

God Bites Man at Yale

Comments 2

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    I said this to a coleague who is a retired Verizon VP and he agreed, “if the FCC doesn’t free up more unlicensed spectrum to support all the municipal networks being built they should be renamed the ICCC (Incumbant Carrier Colusion Commision).”

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    I said this to a coleague who is a retired Verizon VP and he agreed, “if the FCC doesn’t free up more unlicensed spectrum to support all the municipal networks being built they should be renamed the ICCC (Incumbant Carrier Colusion Commision).”

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved